標題: We wanted to estimate the keyword coverage for each [打印本頁] 作者: fahimfoysal04 時間: 2024-3-9 13:31 標題: We wanted to estimate the keyword coverage for each Volume Quality First, we compared all seven tools at the same time. For each keyword in our sample of 10,000, we designated the platform whose value was closest to the GSC reference value as the winner. Based on these comparisons, Semrush had the most wins. Percentage of search volumes closest to GSC The sum of all results does not equal 100%, as there were situations where multiple tools showed the same search volume. In these cases, all of these tools were considered winners.
Semrush had the highest percentage Azerbaijan WhatsApp Numberof keyword search volume closest to the GSC value (the higher the better). Next, we also conducted a series of head-to-head comparisons to assess how our search volume compared to that of each platform. Best accuracy for search volume In all cases, Semrush won these head-to-heads by a large margin. Accuracy of trending keywords As we dug deeper into the data, we found several reasons why other tools performed significantly worse than Semrush.
One reason is inaccurate volume of trending keywords. Trending keywords are searched for the first time due to current events, or in seasonal waves. News, sports, and entertainment are common categories where trending keywords can be found. Here are examples: trending keywords These platforms may have some trending terms in their database, but their search volumes were not close to the actual values of our benchmark. We believe that trending keyword accuracy is another great indicator of a database's relevance, showing you how up-to-date the database is overall. Additionally, targeting trending keywords can have a huge impact on your SEO, so you need to have accurate data to take advantage of it. Discover our new search volume avec Keyword Magic Tool Try for free → ADS illustration Part 2. Database coverage.
