Athe appeal in the interest of the law and the pronouncement of a judgment unifying the practice. The President of the High Court of Cassation and Justice Mrs. Judge Iulia Cristina Tarcea declares the debates closed and the panel of judges remains in the judgment on the appeal in the interest of the law. HIGH COURT deliberating on the appeal in the interest of the law notes the following Referral to the High Court of Cassation and Justice On June through Address no. thenotified the High Court of Cassation and Justice with the resolution of the appeal in the interest of the law regarding interpretation and application of the provisions of art. of the.
Code of Civil Procedure the solution of the court of judicial review in the event that Country Email List the party exercises a wrong appeal different from the one correctly mentioned in the operative part of the contested decision. The legal appeal was registered at the High Court of Cassation and Justice on June forming File no. with a resolution deadline of October . The object of the appeal in the interest of the law From the content of the appeal in the interest of.
The law declared according to the provisions of art. of the Code of Civil Procedure by the Management Board of the Court of Appeal Braov it follows that in the practice of the courts there is no unified point of view regarding the solution pronounced by the court of judicial control in the hypothesis where the party exercises a wrong appeal different from the one correctly mentioned in the operative part of the decision. Thus some courts have rejected as inadmissible the wrongly declared appeal considering that in the case it is not possible to apply the provisions of art. para. of the.